Rapid growth of the Internet infrastructure in Iran during the past decade and new advancements in IT and e-commerce area in the world have contributed to the importance of the Internet and e-commerce. These changes have resulted in prospering Internet-based businesses and e-commerce in Iran and also across the world. This study aims to examine drivers of e-commerce marketing capabilities and their impact on export venture e-commerce performance and export market growth with mediating role of efficiencies. Results from a survey of 380 managers or employees working in export section of Iran’s firms indicate that drivers of e-commerce resources and technology orientation have a positive impact on e-commerce marketing capabilities whereas no significant relationship was found between market orientation and e-commerce marketing capabilities. Further, it was also found that efficiencies including distribution and communication mediate the relationship between e-commerce marketing capabilities and export venture e-commerce performance. Finally, export venture e-commerce performance has a positive impact on export market growth.
The Internet is an evolving technology through which the new business relationships development has been facilitated and cross-border market opportunities have been given to companies (Hinson & Adjasi, 2009; Petersen et al., 2002)
In today’s global marketplace, it’s impossible to ignore the importance of exports. Firms engage with international markets through exporting as the most popular way (Leonidou & Katsikeas, 2010).
While it’s been identified that there is a potential link between the Internet and export outcomes (Morgan-Thomas, 2009), the specific role of the Internet on international marketing pathways has mainly been disregarded by extant research (Sinkovics et al., 2013). Further, the evaluation of the Internet that plays as a driver of the international performance of firms has also been overlooked by existing research (Pezderka et al., 2012; Lu and Julian, 2008)
In today’s exporting world, investing in e-commerce resources has turned into usual practice and as a result, is easily imitated by other firms. But gaining success is not simply ensured by investing in resources related to information technologies (IT). Therefore, researchers challenge the direct impact of IT resources on performance (Ravichandran et al., 2009)
E-commerce is definitely one of the greatest technological developments in the last two decades, driving in-depth change in global business. It has primary benefits that involve entering into new markets, enhanced customer base, well-run and efficient supply chains, enhanced customer service, increased profits and diminished costs (Karavdic and Gregory, 2005).
According to the recent findings used the resource-based view of thecompany (RBV), focusing on the outcomes of resource deployment processes (e.g. capabilities) and how firm capabilities aid in executing firm strategies are suggested by these findings (Vorhies et al., 2009)
Though the existence of theoretical and conceptual advances in this area, surprisingly, little empirical work exists assessing the prediction of capabilities theory as “technology-based capabilities assist in creating marketing efficiencies” (DeSarbo et al., 2007). Though focusing on developing resources and capabilities such as e-commerce has much importance for international marketers, lack of knowledge on how the integration of IT resources and capabilities boosts marketing efficiencies and improves exporting performance as well as export market growth is considered as an important gap, existing in the exports arena. Further, in this study the concept of e-marketing has been considered as a vital aspect of e-commerce marketing.
On the other hand, Iran as a developing country has advanced considerably in IT and its infrastructures in the country during the past decade. Given the existing export markets in neighboring Iran, paying attention to the use of IT in various industries and employing it in direction of expanding and improving exports seems to be essential. Therefore, this study aims to examine drivers of e-commerce marketing capabilities and their impact on export venture e-commerce performance and export market growth with mediating role of efficiencies.
In this model, we added two more drivers (such as market orientation and technology orientation) to the model proposed by Gregory et al., (2017). Furthermore, we assessed the relationship between export venture e-commerce performance and export market growth. As we can see, the length of relationships between latent variables (except market orientation whose relationship with e-commerce marketing capabilities was not supported) is greater than 0.4. This indicates that our model is strongly supported, particularly in terms of the hypotheses of H3 and H4 whose length of relationships are greater than 0.7. Therefore, managers of exporting firms should note these results in their decision-making and this model can be used in the context of new technologies particularly e-commerce
At the end, we do thank all those who helped us to conduct this research, particularly those exporting firms that gave us the list of their employees to contact them and also those employees who cooperated with us in answering to the questionnaire.
1- Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 493–520.
2- Barney, J. B. (1997). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3- Bianchi, C., Mathews, S., (2016). Internet marketing and export market growth in Chile. Journal of Business Research, 69, 426–434.
4- Cavusgil, S. T., & Zou, S. (1994). Marketing strategy-performance relationship: An investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 1–21.
5- Clarke, G. (2008). Has the Internet increased exports for firms from low and middle income countries. Information Economics and Policy, 20(1), 16.
6- Daniel, A., Wilson, H., & Myers, A. (2002). Adoption of e-commerce by SMEs in the UK. International Small Business Journal, 20(3), 253–270.
7- Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 37−52.
8- Deligonul, Z. S., & Cavusgil, S. T. (1997). Does the comparative advantage theory of competition really replace the neoclassic theory of perfect competition? Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 65–73.
9- DeSarbo, W. S., Di Benedetto, C. A., & Song, M. (2007). A heterogeneous resource based view for exploring relationships between firm performance and capabilities. Journal of Modeling in Management, 2(2), 103–130.
10- Dhanaraj, C., & Beamish, P. W. (2003). A resource-based approach to the study of export performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(3), 242–261.
11- Frazer, L., & Lawley, M. (2000). Questionnaire Design & Administration. Brisbane: John Wiley & Sons Australia.
12- Gabrielsson, M., & Manek Kirpalani, V. H. (2004). Born globals: How to reach new business space rapidly. International Business Review, 13(5), 555–571.
13- Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J. M. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 77−90.
14- Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy implementation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135.
15- Gregory, G.D., Ngo, L.V., Karavdic, M., (2016). Developing e-commerce marketing capabilities and efficiencies for enhanced performance in business-to-business export ventures. Industrial Marketing Management, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.03.002.
16- Hair ,J.F., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt ,M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2) , 139-152.
17- Hinson, R., & Adjasi, C. (2009). The Internet and export: Some cross-country evidence from selected African countries. Journal of Internet Commerce, 8(3), 309–324.
18- Hinson, R., & Adjasi, C. (2009). The Internet and export: Some cross-country evidence from selected African countries. Journal of Internet Commerce, 8(3), 309–324.
19- Houghton, K. A., &Winklhofer, H. (2004). The effect ofwebsite and e-commerce adoption on the relationship between SMEs and their export intermediaries. International Small Business Journal, 22(4), 369–388.
20- Karavdic, M., & Gregory, G. (2005). Integrating e-commerce into existing export marketing theories: A contingency model. Marketing Theory, 5(1), 75–104.
21- Klein, S. (1987). A transaction cost explanation of vertical integration in international markets. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 17(3), 195–205.
22- Kontinen, T., & Ojala, A. (2010). Internationalization pathways of family SMEs: Psychic distance as a focal point. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 17(3), 437–454.
23- Kotler, P., & Levy, S. J. (1969). Broadening the concept of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 33(1), 10–15.
24- Leonidou, L. C., & Katsikeas, C. S. (2010). Integrative assessment of exporting research articles in business journals during the period 1960–2007. Journal of Business Research, 63(8), 879–887.
25- Loane, S.,McNaughton, R. B., & Bell, J. (2004). The internationalization of Internet-enabled entrepreneurial firms: Evidence from Europe and North America. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 21(1), 79–96.
26- Lu, V., & Julian, C. (2008). The Internet, strategy and performance: A study of Australian export market ventures. Journal of Global Marketing, 21(3), 231–240.
27- Mathews, S., & Healy, M. (2008). ‘From garage to global’: the Internet and international market growth, an SME perspective. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 4(2/3), 179–196.
28- Mathews, S., Bianchi, C., Perks, K.J., Healy, M., (2015). Internet marketing capabilities and international market growth. International Business Review, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.10.007.
29- Matthyssens, P., & Pauwels, P. (1996). Assessing export performance measurement. In S. Tamer Cavusgil, & C. N. Axinn (Eds.), Advances in international marketing. Vol. 8. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
30- Mitchell, V. W. (1994). Using industrial key informants: Some guidelines. Journal of the Market Research Society, 36(April), 139–145.
31- Morgan, N. A., Katsikeas, C. S., & Vorhies, D. W. (2012). Export marketing strategy implementation, export marketing capabilities, and export venture performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(2), 271–289.
32- Morgan-Thomas, A. (2009). Online activities and export performance of the smaller firm: A capability perspective. European Journal of International Management, 3(3), 266–285.
33- Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20−35.
34- Petersen, B., Welch, L. S., & Liesch, P. W. (2002). The Internet and foreign market expansion by firms. Management International Review, 42(2), 207–221.
35- Peterson, R. A., Balasubramanian, S., & Bronnenberg, B. J. (1997). Exploring the implications of the Internet for consumer marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 329–346.
36- Pezderka, N., Sinkovics, R., & Jean, R. J. B. (2012). Do born global SMEs reap more benefits from ICT use than other internationalizing small firms? In M. Gabrielsson & V. H. Manek Kirpalani (Eds.), Handbook of research on born globals (pp. 185–213). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
37- Porter, M. E. (1986). Competition in global industries. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press.
38- Ravichandran, T., Liu, Y., Han, S., & Hasan, I. (2009). Diversification and firm performance: Exploring the moderating effects of information technology spending. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(4), 205–240.
39- Rodgers, S., & Sheldon, K. M. (2002). An improved way to characterize Internet users. Journal of Advertising Research, 42(5), 85–94.
40- Rosen, A. (2000). The e-commerce question and answer book, USA, American Management Association. The Office of SMEs Promotion: OSMEP. (2013). SME White Paper Report 2013, http://goo.gl/nWpHYm.
41- Rosson, P. J., & Ford, L. D. (1982). Manufacturer-overseas distributor relations and export performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 13(2), 57–72.
42- Sinkovics, N., Sinkovics, R. R., & Jean, R. J. B. (2013). The Internet as an alternative path to internationalization? International Marketing Review, 30(2), 130–155.
43- Song, M. C., Di Benedetto, A., & Mason, R. W. (2007). Capabilities and financial performance: The moderating effect of strategic type. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1), 18−34.
44- Toften, K., & Hammervoll, T. (2011). International market selection and growth strategies for niche firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 13(3/4), 282.
45- Trainor K.J., Rapp, A., Beitelspacher, L.S., Schillewaert, N., (2011). Integrating information technology and marketing: An examination of the drivers and outcomes of e-Marketing capability. Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 162–174.
46- Vorhies, D. W., & Morgan, N. A. (2005). Benchmarking marketing capabilities for sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Marketing, 69(1), 80–94.
47- Vorhies, D. W., Morgan, R. E., & Autry, C. W. (2009). Product-market strategy and the marketing capabilities of the firm: Impact on market effectiveness and cash flow performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(12), 1310–1334.
48- Zhou, K. Z., Yim, C. K.,&Tse, D. T. (2005). The effects of strategic orientation son technology and market-based breakthrough innovations. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 42−60.
49- Zhu, K. (2004). The complementarity of information technology infrastructure and ecommerce capability: A resource-based assessment of their business value. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(1), 167–202.
DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE RESEARCH PAPER PDF
347 total views, 1 views today