Design Concept and Model of Pedagogical System of University Teachers’ Training for Tutors Activities

Author Name(s): Glukhov Gennady Vasilyevich, *Gromova Tatiana Vladimirovna, Nikitina Irina Nikolaevna
Author Email: gromova73@yandex.ru

Abstract

The article is devoted to designing a model of pedagogical system of training University teachers for tutors activities (tutors – here: teachers in the distance learning system). Currently, few universities can offer much in the training of distance learning teachers /tutors. Insufficient number of tutors and /or their unsatisfactory readiness (professional, psychological, technical) seem to be the main obstacle in the use of distance learning (DL) in universities. The organization of special tutors training is considered possible solution to the problem and a resource for improving the quality of professional education. The article reflects the following aspects: the basic provisions of the design concept of pedagogical system of teachers training for tutors’ activities are justified; the model of pedagogical system of training university teachers for tutoring activities is presented; general characteristics of structural components of pedagogical system of teachers training in DL system (goal, content, means of pedagogical communication, trainers, trainees) are introduced. The obtained results can be used in DL teachers training in educational institutions of different profile

Introduction

Establishing a context

Despite the technical equipment of many universities high potential of distance and information technology is not being used fully due to the lack or insufficient readiness of universities teachers to fulfill activities in DL system (DLS). The challenge is therefore to prepare the staff. We believe that the system of training of high school teachers to work in the field of distance education will improve the quality of their professional skills and broaden the scope of educational activities in case:- its development and implementation is conducted on the basis of the analysis of the distance training and the identification of scientific and practical prerequisites of pedagogical system model of training of high school teachers to students distance learning;- The components of the designed theoretical model of pedagogical system of teachers training (goal, content, and means of pedagogical communication, trainers, and trainees) are determined by the requirements of acceleration of socio-economic development of the country and modern pedagogical and information and communication technologies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, it should be noted that at the result of the work the following aspects were reflected: basic principles of designing of pedagogical system of teachers’ training for tutors activities, the model of pedagogical system of tutors training; general characteristics of the structural components of pedagogical activity of teachers training system in DL (goal, content, means of pedagogical communication, teachers, students). The continuation of further studies of this problem lies in the development of technology and testing of models of joint activities of students and teachers in DLS developing the model of personal and professional competence of the DL teacher aimed at the creation of professionally significant qualities of the DL teacher and developing technologies for the preparation of teachers to work in DLS. The materials can be used in various kinds of teachers training courses and by the teachers who want to work in DLS in educational institutions of different profile (for more information see Gromova, 2011 [11]).

References                                         

  1. Alvarez, I., Guasch, T. & Espasa, A. (2009). University teacher roles and competencies in online learning environments: A theoretical analysis of teaching and learning practices. European Journal of TeacherEducation, Vol. 32 (3), pp. 321-336.
  2. Benque, N. (1999). Online training for Tutors. Proceedings of Online Education. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 208 р
  3. Borisova, N. V. & Kuzov, V. B. (2000). What will the teacher be in the era of virtual education? (Model of a teacher – tutor). Quality Education: Problems and Solutions: scientific seminar: abstracts. Novosibirsk, pp. 107- 114.
  4. Kazanskaya, O.V. & Nikitina, N.Sh. (2001). Teacher training in the field of distance learning technologies. Training for the open and distance education system.  Tomsk: Publishing house of Tomsk State University, 146 p.
  5. Liyanagunawardena, T.R., Adams, A.A., Rassool, N., Williams, S.A. (2014). Blended learning in distance education: Sri Lankan perspective. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 10, Issue 1, pp. 55-69.
  6. Virgil, E. & Varvel, J. (2007). Master online teacher competencies. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Vol. 10(1), 1-41.
  7. Akhmatova, D.B. & Gurje, L.I. (2011). High school teacher and innovative technology. Higher Education in Russia, 4, pp. 138-144.
  8. Khursheed, B. (2001). Students and Tutors. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 218 p.
  9. Rowland, S. (2000). The Encouraging University teacher. Buckingham: Open University Press, 246 р.
  10. Moiseyeva, M. V. (2001). Preparation of Tutors in the area of new teaching technologies for distance learning system. Quality of remote education: concepts, problems. Zhukovskiy: MIM LINK, pp. 42-45.
  11. Gromova, T. (2011). Theory and technology of teachers preparation for work in distance learning (Doctoral dissertation). Tolyatti State University, Tolyatti, Samarskaya region, RF, 383 p.
  12. Kustov, Y.A., V. A. Gusev. (2006). 10 lectures on the systems approach in vocational education. Samara-Togliatti, 90 p.
  13. Bezrukova, V.S. (1990). Education: a Textbook for engineering and pedagogical specialties. Yekaterinburg: Sverdlovsk engineering-pedagogical Institute, 122 p.
  14. Belousov, A.I. & Gromova, T.V. (2011). Determining the readiness of the of high school teacher to distance education in the context of modernization of the education system. Vestnik of Samara University, Vol. 2-3 (27), pp. 287-295.
  15. Lerner, I. Y. (1981). Didactic bases of teaching methods. Moscow: Pedagogy, 186 p.
  16. Lewis, Peter A., Tutticci, Naomi F., Douglas, Clint, Gray, Genevieve, Osborne, Yvonne, Evans, Katie, Nielson, Catherine M. (2016). Flexible learning: Evaluation of an international distance education program designed to build the learning and teaching capacity of nurse academics in a developing country. Original Research Article Nurse Education in Practice, 21, 59-65.
  17. Gluhov, G.V., Gromova, T. V. (2016). Functional Components and Roles of the University Teacher in Distance Education. International Review of Management and Marketing. (S5). 235-242. Available at http: www.econjournals.com.
  18. Atayan, Z.Sh. (2001). Technology of work of university teachers in LMS of MIM LINK. Quality Assurance System in Distance Education,  1. Zhukovsky: MIM LINK, pp.63-69.
  19. Gavrilova, E.L. & Sergeyeva T.A. (2001). Direct interaction of the teacher with the students in open distance education. Quality Assurance System in Distance Education. Zhukovsky: MIM LINK, Vol. 3, pp. 86-97.
  20. Tuninga, R. (1995). The Supply and Demand of Distance Education in Russia. The World Bank, Bureau Cross, 110 р.
  21. Kraineva, R. K. (2009). The System of management of educational services using distance technologies. (Abstract of candidate dissertation). Samara: Samara state university of economics, 22 p.
  22. Khutorskoy, A. V. (2001). Scientific-pedagogical preconditions of distance pedagogics. Open Education, Vol. 2, 30-35.

167 total views, 1 views today

Download PDF File

About the author: admin