Author Email: subaeva.ak@mail.ru
Abstract
Technical support to and technological modernization of agriculture is an important direction in the development of agricultural production. At present, there is a tendency in agriculture to the obsolescence and break down of equipment. Partly, the acquisition of high-performance equipment and the introduction of resource-saving technologies, the use of combined soil cultivating and sowing units compensates for the deficit. At the same time, the level of supply with technical means of many agricultural enterprises does not allow for timely fulfillment of all technological operations in the set agrotechnical time limits [1]. As a consequence, the role of secondary technology in raising the level of agricultural machinery remains one of the important directions. The object of the study is Ulyanovsk Region. The study presents statistical data for 2011. The grouping of agricultural enterprises in Ulyanovsk region by their financial and economic indicators made it possible to divide all agricultural enterprises of the region into three groups and make recommendations for the development of technical potential. In this situation, the role of secondary machinery in increasing the level of technical provision of agriculture is becoming increasingly important.
Introduction
Agricultural engineering is one of the important factors in the development of the agro-industrial complex. The growth rate of the development of the agrarian sector depends on the level of technical availability. In conditions of financial instability of many agricultural enterprises, the secondary market of agricultural machinery is a convincing alternative to renewal of fixed production assets.
The largest part of the AIC of the regions of Russia feels an acute shortage in technology, so the use of the secondary market is the most acceptable. The main goal of this market is to provide agricultural producers with cheaper additional equipment, which becomes relevant against the background of low purchasing power [2].
The advantages of the market of second-hand agricultural machinery are low price in comparison with the new products; proven performance of machinery and equipment; the possibility of direct contact between the seller and the buyer, which shortens the delivery time of equipment; alternative methods of payment under contracts of sale; simplification of resale in a short time with more favorable conditions; braking of losses in the price in comparison with the new technology losing a high share in its price in the first years of operation. Disadvantages are: physical and moral wear and tear of machinery, non-provision of guarantees for operating units and for the whole range of machinery and equipment; and the risk in payments and supplies related to transportation and insurance [3].
Conclusion
Thus, the new and second-hand agricultural machinery market is subject to certain changes. It is mobile; the state comprehensively supports both the development of domestic agricultural machinery, and the financial and economic incentives for machinery buyers. The measures taken should strengthen the positions of Russian producers of agricultural products and machinery and raise their competitiveness
References
- Polukhin A.A. Features of the use of the technical potential of Russian agriculture at the regional level / A.А. Polukhin // Education, Science and Production. – 2013. – No. 2 (3). – pp. 16 – 21.
- Alpatov A.B. Features of pricing in the market of domestic agricultural machinery in the framework of WTO and EEU agreements / A.V. Alpatov / Chief mechanic. – 2015. – No. 9. – pp. 56-68.
- Negmetzianov A.V. Optimization of the regional market of agricultural machinery: on the example of the Udmurt Republic: Thesis, PhD Economics: 08.00.05 / Negmetzianov Andrei Vladimirovich; [Place of defense: Udmurt State University]. – Izhevsk, 2010. – p. 196.
- Subaeva A.K. The economic mechanism of technical support to agriculture (monograph) / A.K. Subaeva // Monograph – Kazan: Publishing house LLC “Publishing and printing company “Brig”, 2016, p. 216.
- Alpatov A.V. Evaluation of the secondary market of agricultural machinery / A.V. Alpatov / Rural machinery operator. – 2016. – No.1. – pp. 4-7.
- Vodiannikov V.T., Sereda N.A. Reproduction of the technical potential of agriculture in the conditions of innovative development: monograph / V.T. Vodiannikov, N.A. Sereda. – Karavaevo: Kostroma State Agricultural Academy, 2014. – p. 228.
- Van Duijn J.J. Fluctuations in innovations over time. – Futures, 1981. 13, – № 4. – P. 264-273.
- Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. – European Commission, 2002, COM (2010) 2020 final.
- Subaeva A.K., Zamaidinov A.A. Classification of agroindustrial complex technical provision effectiveness indexes/ A.K. Subaeva, А.А. Zamaidinov А.А. // JOURNAL OF economics and Economic education research 2016; 4(17): 8-14 issn: 1533-3590
- Subaeva A.K., Zamaidinov A.A. Methods of agricultural machinery market regulation / A.K. Subaeva, А.А. Zamaidinov А.А. // International Business Management 2015; 9(7): 1780-1784. ISSN: 1993-5250.
1,620 total views, no views today