Predicting RNA Tertiary Structure Using Parallel Algorithm

Author Name: Ujjwala H Mandekar, Dr.Leena Patil, Dr. Sunanda Khandait
Author Email:


To method most of the biological practicality, it’s necessary to fold RNA molecule into tertiary structures. The assorted techniques those are offered for predicting RNA tertiary structures are terribly expensive with time complexness. However currently each day with a major analysis in bioinformatics, prediction of RNA structure is a lot of reliable. During this paper, we’ve delineate a unique strategy for prediction of RNA tertiary structure victimization parallel algorithms. The most options of this software package are the physics-based loop free energy calculations for numerous RNA structure motifs and a template-based assembly technique for tertiary structure prediction. For illustration, we have a tendency to use the d.5.a.D.mobilis as Associate in Nursing example to indicate the implementation of the algorithmic rule in RNA structure prediction from the sequence.


RNA Folding, Base Pairs, Kissing Pairs, Template Assembly, GT fold.


The various experimental ways, like X-ray natural philosophy (1), nuclear magnetic resonance (2) and microscopy (3), will verify RNA tertiary structures in high or low resolutions. But, victimization experimental ways to work out RNA structures will be overpriced and time intense. With the fast advances of RNA sequencing technology (4), it’s unacceptable to catch up the stress for prime resolution RNA tertiary structures victimization experimental ways. As compared to experimental ways, procedure structure prediction becomes an extremely needed tool for RNA structure prediction. A RNA structure will be delineate at primary, secondary and tertiary levels. A primary sequence may be a string of 4 sorts of nucleotides. A secondary structure is outlined by the gathering of various sorts of base pairs, that provides structural constrains for tertiary structure folding. There are several algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction. Broadly they are classified into 2 major classes (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10): sequence alignment-based ways and free energy-based ways. In general, sequence alignment software package provides reliable second structures if homologous sequences are offered. However, many various structures, which cannot be expected by the comparative sequence analysis technique, also can be functionally necessary. For instance, ribo switches bear a conformational amendment in response to binding of a regulative molecule (12). Free energy-based ways, like Mfold (13), RNA structure (14), and RNAfold (15), calculate the free energies for Associate in Nursing ensemble of structures and realize the minimum free energy structure or the foremost probable (average) structure. The common issue among these ways is that the relevance of thermodynamical parameters for loops and helices. The thermodynamical parameters for helices and easy loops (i.e. small-size pin, internal/bulge loops) are determined consistently and compiled because the Turner’s parameters (16). However, free energy parameters of alternative a lot of sophisticated loops stay unknown and want to be determined through a procedure model. Predicting RNA secondary structure isn’t sufficient to get high resolution tertiary structure. Out of one secondary structure, there are prospects of an oversized range of tertiary structures because of the multiplicity of versatile loop conformations. Thence it’s necessary to model the structures of the unmated nucleotides of secondary structures and therefore the relative orientations of helices. There are many alternative ways that to predict RNA tertiary structures from given secondary structures. The foremost in style technique is to use knowledge-based physical phenomenon and predict RNA tertiary structures from coarse-grained distinct molecular dynamics (DMD) simulations (17, 18, 19, and 20). Here the coarse-grained illustration for RNA conformations will significantly decrease the quantity of free bases of Associate in Nursing RNA system, and so increase the completeness of the conformational sampling. However the worst drawback within the simulations is that the sampled conformations typically stay near the initial beginning model, which needs the employment of assorted special simulation techniques to attain effective sampling of conformational house. An attempt to avoid this drawback is to use template-based structure prediction algorithmic rule (21, 22, 23, and 24). However within the template-based approaches, one in every of the common restrictions is that the restricted amount of variance of the model library. On the opposite hand, as a lot of and a lot of RNA structures are by experimentation determined, we will much expect the continual enhancements within the accuracy of structure prediction victimization template-based prediction algorithms. The recently developed model may be a free energy-based RNA folding model to predict RNA structures and thermodynamical stabilities from the sequence. Compared with alternative RNA structure prediction software package (13, 14, 15, 22), this algorithmic rule uses a model primarily based illustration for RNA conformations. The model takes under consideration all the doable loop conformations in tertiary house to calculate loop entropy. During this paper, we have a tendency to illustrate the applying of this software package in RNA structure prediction.


We have developed an incontestable and economical technique for the absolutely machine-driven prediction of RNA tertiary structures from secondary structures. The accuracy of the strategy can increase significantly with the expansion of the RNA FRABASE dictionary. We have a tendency to predict an extra development of the AI system to the nucleic acids structure modelling victimization completely different dictionaries (databases).

86 total views, 1 views today

Download File

About the author: admin